cl-test-grid results for svn revision 14755

Erik Huelsmann ehuels at gmail.com
Thu Apr 9 20:08:42 UTC 2015


Ok. I understand the problem now. This is indeed caused by my commit,
however, the old code had a similar problem -- not with LABELS, but with
FLET, which apparently nobody ever ran into yet: There's a problem in the
order of macro-expansion versus binding the local functions to shadow
macros in the lexical environment.

Working on a fix now.

On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Erik Huelsmann <ehuels at gmail.com> wrote:

> Ah. This is probably the compiled version which fails. The interpreted
> version is the one I ran.
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Anton Vodonosov <avodonosov at yandex.ru>
> wrote:
>
>> Reproduce it like this:
>>
>>   (ql:quickload :cl-cont-test)
>>   (let ((rtest::*compile-tests* t)) (rtest:do-tests))
>>
>> The RT test framework has two modes, rtest::*compile-tests* == t and nil.
>> cl-test-grid runs both modes.
>>
>> > Did the cl-cont tests run in their own ABCL instance?
>> Yes, separate ABCL process.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> - Anton
>>
>> 09.04.2015, 21:55, "Erik Huelsmann" <ehuels at gmail.com>:
>> > Hi Anton,
>> >
>> > On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Anton Vodonosov <avodonosov at yandex.ru>
>> wrote:
>> >> 07.04.2015, 01:07, "Erik Huelsmann" <ehuels at gmail.com>:
>> >>>
>> >>> Bummer that the change causes regressions and no improvements.
>> >>
>> >> Note, we don't know exactly what of the changes between release 1.3.1
>> and the current dev version
>> >> causes the regressions, it's not necessary the last commit.
>> >
>> > Sure. That's no problem. However, I'm not understanding something: I
>> tested the cl-cont LABELS-2 and -3 failures. On my own system they didn't
>> fail. Is there something in the tester environment that could make it fail?
>> Did the cl-cont tests run in their own ABCL instance? Or did they run after
>> lots of other test in the same instance?
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > --
>> > Bye,
>> >
>> > Erik.
>> >
>> > http://efficito.com -- Hosted accounting and ERP.
>> > Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Bye,
>
> Erik.
>
> http://efficito.com -- Hosted accounting and ERP.
> Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in.
>



-- 
Bye,

Erik.

http://efficito.com -- Hosted accounting and ERP.
Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/armedbear-devel/attachments/20150409/4915cdd7/attachment.html>


More information about the armedbear-devel mailing list