cl-test-grid results for svn revision 14755

[Erik Huelsmann]

Ah. This is probably the compiled version which fails. The interpreted
version is the one I ran.

On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Anton Vodonosov <avodonosov at yandex.ru>
wrote:

> Reproduce it like this:
>
>   (ql:quickload :cl-cont-test)
>   (let ((rtest::*compile-tests* t)) (rtest:do-tests))
>
> The RT test framework has two modes, rtest::*compile-tests* == t and nil.
> cl-test-grid runs both modes.
>
> > Did the cl-cont tests run in their own ABCL instance?
> Yes, separate ABCL process.
>
> Best regards,
> - Anton
>
> 09.04.2015, 21:55, "Erik Huelsmann" <ehuels at gmail.com>:
> > Hi Anton,
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Anton Vodonosov <avodonosov at yandex.ru>
> wrote:
> >> 07.04.2015, 01:07, "Erik Huelsmann" <ehuels at gmail.com>:
> >>>
> >>> Bummer that the change causes regressions and no improvements.
> >>
> >> Note, we don't know exactly what of the changes between release 1.3.1
> and the current dev version
> >> causes the regressions, it's not necessary the last commit.
> >
> > Sure. That's no problem. However, I'm not understanding something: I
> tested the cl-cont LABELS-2 and -3 failures. On my own system they didn't
> fail. Is there something in the tester environment that could make it fail?
> Did the cl-cont tests run in their own ABCL instance? Or did they run after
> lots of other test in the same instance?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > --
> > Bye,
> >
> > Erik.
> >
> > http://efficito.com -- Hosted accounting and ERP.
> > Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in.
>



-- 
Bye,

Erik.

http://efficito.com -- Hosted accounting and ERP.
Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/armedbear-devel/attachments/20150409/ad41f13f/attachment.html>