[hunchentoot-devel] COMET with Hunchentoot?

[Slawek Zak]

On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Hans Hübner <hans.huebner at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 18:04, Slawek Zak <slawek.zak at gmail.com> wrote:
> > It is possible, but handle-incomming-connection is now in fact a thin
> > wrapper around process-connection which does all the work, thus having
> > process management depend on request contents requires one to patch or
> > rewrite process-connection to simply avoid reading request data which
> have
> > been read already.
>
> I did not mean to say that it would be possible without changing
> Hunchentoot.  In fact, I meant to say that the interaction between
> PROCESS-CONNECTION and PROCESS-REQUEST would need to be rewritten.  I
> have no current plans to do this, as I don't need the feature.  If you
> plan on doing it, looking at http://weitz.de/patches.html and
> discussing the details of the proposed API here will increase the
> likeliness that it will end up in Hunchentoot itself.
>

Fine, I will try to come up with some clean API and implementation to do
this.

/S
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/tbnl-devel/attachments/20090304/db331e01/attachment.html>