[slime-devel] Re: Did someone say they were working on a GF browser?

[Helmut Eller]

Thomas Schilling <tjs_ng at yahoo.de> writes:

> What do you think of the current style of making it a xref add-on?
> Would you prefer a stand-alone gf browser buffer? (or do you have no
> opinion on this issue?)

I don't use CLOS, so I don't have much need or thought about this
feature.  It might be easier to have a separate command instead of
using M-. directly; something like the who-* commands, i.e. use the
xref buffer but call a different Swank function.  That probably needs
a only little bit more code than the current variant but would be more
orthogonal.

Helmut.