[slime-devel] Re: Did someone say they were working on a GF browser?
Thomas Schilling
tjs_ng at yahoo.de
Fri Jul 30 22:50:37 UTC 2004
just for the archives :)
my original cc didn't work, but the p.s. is obsolete now
-ts
,-----
> Thomas Schilling <tjs_ng at yahoo.de> writes:
>
>> + "Takes a method description and tries to remove this method.
>> +MSPEC string must be a string representation of a list with the format
>> +(METHOD NAME {QUALIFIER}* SPECIALIZER-LIST).
>> +
> [...]
>> + (fboundp (second sexp)))
>> + (let* ((gf (fdefinition (second sexp)))
>> + (qualifiers (loop for q in (cddr sexp)
>> + while (not (listp q))
>> + collect q))
>> + (specializers (car (last sexp)))
>> + (method (find-method
>> + gf qualifiers
>> + (mapcar (lambda (x)
>> + ;;FIXME: is it really a good
>> idea
>> + ;;to call eval here?
>> + (if (consp x)
>> + (list 'eql (eval (cdr x)))
>> + (find-class x)))
>> + specializers)
>
> Passing the "method descriptions" as a strings between Emacs and Lisp
> is a bit problematic (read-case, package ...). If I where to build a
> GF browser I'd keep the list of methods as first class values on the
> Lisp side. The index in the list could then be used to refer to a
> particular method.
Well, that would make many things easier/more portable. And it would make
it work with eql-specializers on acl62.
Ok, I'll give it a try.
What do you think of the current style of making it a xref add-on? Would
you prefer a stand-alone gf browser buffer? (or do you have no opinion on
this issue?)
-Thomas
p.s.: cc'ing to slime-devel at common-lisp.net doesn't seem to work. at least
I couldn't see any newer messages in the archive and the never appear on
gmane.lisp.slime.devel
More information about the slime-devel
mailing list