[slime-devel] SLIME on a local socket
Brian Mastenbrook
bmastenb at cs.indiana.edu
Mon Dec 1 15:19:58 UTC 2003
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Dec 1, 2003, at 3:25 AM, Helmut Eller wrote:
> I don't know why people are so keen to use a setup where the Lisp and
> Emacs are on different machines, but whenever I tried to do something
> like that (e.g, with remote-compile) it didn't work very well and I
> always run Emacs on the same machine. Is this a feature we want to
> support or is this a would-be-nice-in-an-ideal-world thing?
I don't see why not - if we make the assumption of a shared directory,
possibly with different mountpoints, then what's the difference from
Emacs' perspective between a local lisp and an ssh-tunneled lisp? This
way I can test my code on CMUCL (I'm on OS X) from my pretty local
Emacs.
- --
Brian Mastenbrook
bmastenb at cs.indiana.edu
http://cs.indiana.edu/~bmastenb/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3
iQA/AwUBP8tb72nXQDi0istxEQJjKQCfZ5Xkh6RISttPXRTfSiI36paqJa4AoIdC
FA3F9IF3wIjztEK14qSp8afo
=4RVh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the slime-devel
mailing list