before and after methods

[Steve Haflich]

You're apparently confusing two different meaning of "standard".  It's not
the meaning that something is defined in the ANS and therefore built into
the standard ANSI CL language.   Rather, it is a standard
method-combination that is not the one known as STANDARD-METHOD-COMBINATION.

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Ken Tilton <ken.tilton at weather.com> wrote:

> Ah, but the OP specified "built-in" along with "non-standard".
>
> hth
>
> -hk
>
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Sam Steingold <sds at gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> > * Didier Verna <qvqvre at yeqr.rcvgn.se> [2017-05-17 17:33:40 +0200]:
>> >
>> > Does anyone know why the non-standard built-in method combinations do
>> > not support before and after methods?
>>
>> If you are defining the method combination, you have way more freedom
>> and flexibility than mere before and after.
>> Basically, you can do it yourself.
>>
>> --
>> Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on darwin Ns 10.3.1504
>> http://steingoldpsychology.com http://www.childpsy.net
>> https://ffii.org http://camera.org http://think-israel.org
>> http://no2bds.org
>> Do not worry about which side your bread is buttered on: you eat BOTH
>> sides.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Ken **Tilton  *|Software Engineer
> *w:* (555) 555-5555      *e:* ken.tilton at weather.com
> <http://weather.com/apps> <http://weather.com/apps>
> <http://weather.com/apps> <http://weather.com/apps>
> <http://weather.com/apps> <http://weather.com/apps>
> <http://weather.com/apps> <http://weather.com/apps>
> <http://weather.com/apps> <http://weather.com/apps>
> <http://weather.com/apps> <http://weather.com/apps>
> <http://weather.com/apps> <http://weather.com/apps>
> <http://weather.com/apps> <http://weather.com/apps>
> <http://weather.com/apps>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/pro/attachments/20170519/74904110/attachment.html>