before and after methods

[Steve Haflich]

As for the original question, I don't see any reason the various built-in
method combination could not have been defined to support :before and
:after methods.  But the way they are defined is consonant with the short
form of define-method-combination, which implies that the several built-in
method combinations would typically be implemented using short form d-m-c.
So the scope of the original question probably should be expanded to
include short form d-m-c.

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 6:20 PM, Steve Haflich <shaflich at gmail.com> wrote:

> You're apparently confusing two different meaning of "standard".  It's not
> the meaning that something is defined in the ANS and therefore built into
> the standard ANSI CL language.   Rather, it is a standard
> method-combination that is not the one known as STANDARD-METHOD-COMBINATION.
>
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Ken Tilton <ken.tilton at weather.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Ah, but the OP specified "built-in" along with "non-standard".
>>
>> hth
>>
>> -hk
>>
>> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Sam Steingold <sds at gnu.org> wrote:
>>
>>> > * Didier Verna <qvqvre at yeqr.rcvgn.se> [2017-05-17 17:33:40 +0200]:
>>> >
>>> > Does anyone know why the non-standard built-in method combinations do
>>> > not support before and after methods?
>>>
>>> If you are defining the method combination, you have way more freedom
>>> and flexibility than mere before and after.
>>> Basically, you can do it yourself.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on darwin Ns 10.3.1504
>>> http://steingoldpsychology.com http://www.childpsy.net
>>> https://ffii.org http://camera.org http://think-israel.org
>>> http://no2bds.org
>>> Do not worry about which side your bread is buttered on: you eat BOTH
>>> sides.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Ken **Tilton  *|Software Engineer
>> *w:* (555) 555-5555      *e:* ken.tilton at weather.com
>> <http://weather.com/apps> <http://weather.com/apps>
>> <http://weather.com/apps> <http://weather.com/apps>
>> <http://weather.com/apps> <http://weather.com/apps>
>> <http://weather.com/apps> <http://weather.com/apps>
>> <http://weather.com/apps> <http://weather.com/apps>
>> <http://weather.com/apps> <http://weather.com/apps>
>> <http://weather.com/apps> <http://weather.com/apps>
>> <http://weather.com/apps> <http://weather.com/apps>
>> <http://weather.com/apps>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/pro/attachments/20170519/1e28857e/attachment.html>