before and after methods

[Ken Tilton]

Ah, but the OP specified "built-in" along with "non-standard".

hth

-hk

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Sam Steingold <sds at gnu.org> wrote:

> > * Didier Verna <qvqvre at yeqr.rcvgn.se> [2017-05-17 17:33:40 +0200]:
> >
> > Does anyone know why the non-standard built-in method combinations do
> > not support before and after methods?
>
> If you are defining the method combination, you have way more freedom
> and flexibility than mere before and after.
> Basically, you can do it yourself.
>
> --
> Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on darwin Ns 10.3.1504
> http://steingoldpsychology.com http://www.childpsy.net
> https://ffii.org http://camera.org http://think-israel.org
> http://no2bds.org
> Do not worry about which side your bread is buttered on: you eat BOTH
> sides.
>
>


-- 
*Ken **Tilton  *|Software Engineer
*w:* (555) 555-5555      *e:* ken.tilton at weather.com
<http://weather.com/apps> <http://weather.com/apps>
<http://weather.com/apps> <http://weather.com/apps>
<http://weather.com/apps> <http://weather.com/apps>
<http://weather.com/apps> <http://weather.com/apps>
<http://weather.com/apps> <http://weather.com/apps>
<http://weather.com/apps> <http://weather.com/apps>
<http://weather.com/apps> <http://weather.com/apps>
<http://weather.com/apps> <http://weather.com/apps>
<http://weather.com/apps>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/pro/attachments/20170517/2eb86f05/attachment-0001.html>