before and after methods

Sam Steingold sds at
Wed May 17 19:24:48 UTC 2017

> * Didier Verna <qvqvre at> [2017-05-17 17:33:40 +0200]:
> Does anyone know why the non-standard built-in method combinations do
> not support before and after methods?

If you are defining the method combination, you have way more freedom
and flexibility than mere before and after.
Basically, you can do it yourself.

Sam Steingold ( on darwin Ns 10.3.1504
Do not worry about which side your bread is buttered on: you eat BOTH sides.

More information about the pro mailing list