before and after methods

[Sam Steingold]

> * Didier Verna <qvqvre at yeqr.rcvgn.se> [2017-05-17 17:33:40 +0200]:
>
> Does anyone know why the non-standard built-in method combinations do
> not support before and after methods?

If you are defining the method combination, you have way more freedom
and flexibility than mere before and after.
Basically, you can do it yourself.

-- 
Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on darwin Ns 10.3.1504
http://steingoldpsychology.com http://www.childpsy.net
https://ffii.org http://camera.org http://think-israel.org http://no2bds.org
Do not worry about which side your bread is buttered on: you eat BOTH sides.