Errata for hyperspec?

[Faré]

In addition to
http://www.cliki.net/CLHS%20Errata
Don't forget this page:
http://www.cliki.net/Proposed%20ANSI%20Revisions%20and%20Clarifications

—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
Richman's Law: No matter how much the government controls the economic system,
any problem will be blamed on whatever small zone of freedom that remains.
        — Sheldon Richman


On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 1:24 PM, Chaitanya Gupta
<mail at chaitanyagupta.com> wrote:
> On 14 December 2017 at 23:27, Steve Haflich <shaflich at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Just keep in mind that some of the items on the CLiki list propose changes
>> (divergences from) current normative ANSI CL requirements, and that others
>> are simply drafted sloppily.  These changes would not have automatically
>> passed review under the original X3J13 process, and no one should assume
>> their long life on the CLiki page means they would be uncontroversial.
>
> Yes, and the actual errata was listed at the bottom of that page.
>
> I took all of them and set up a new page, organized by chapter and
> with proper links:
>
> http://www.cliki.net/CLHS%20Errata
>
> If the community feels this is fine, I will remove the errata section
> from the earlier page and link to this one instead.
>
> Chaitanya
>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 4:04 AM, Don Morrison <dfm2 at cmu.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>> When I reported an error I’d noticed in the HyperSpec to Lispworks three
>>> years ago their response pointed me at the CLiki page, so I suspect that is
>>> probably the best source of errata available. And, more importantly, that
>>> response seems to imply they have no interest in updating the HyperSpec.
>>> That said, I remain grateful to them that it is available, even in its
>>> ossified form.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Don Morrison <dfm2 at cmu.edu>
>>> “We are not an endangered species ourselves yet, but this
>>> is not for lack of trying.”
>>>                      — Douglas Adams, /Last Chance to See/
>>>
>>
>