Errata for hyperspec?

[Chaitanya Gupta]

On 14 December 2017 at 23:27, Steve Haflich <shaflich at gmail.com> wrote:
> Just keep in mind that some of the items on the CLiki list propose changes
> (divergences from) current normative ANSI CL requirements, and that others
> are simply drafted sloppily.  These changes would not have automatically
> passed review under the original X3J13 process, and no one should assume
> their long life on the CLiki page means they would be uncontroversial.

Yes, and the actual errata was listed at the bottom of that page.

I took all of them and set up a new page, organized by chapter and
with proper links:

http://www.cliki.net/CLHS%20Errata

If the community feels this is fine, I will remove the errata section
from the earlier page and link to this one instead.

Chaitanya

>
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 4:04 AM, Don Morrison <dfm2 at cmu.edu> wrote:
>>
>> When I reported an error I’d noticed in the HyperSpec to Lispworks three
>> years ago their response pointed me at the CLiki page, so I suspect that is
>> probably the best source of errata available. And, more importantly, that
>> response seems to imply they have no interest in updating the HyperSpec.
>> That said, I remain grateful to them that it is available, even in its
>> ossified form.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Don Morrison <dfm2 at cmu.edu>
>> “We are not an endangered species ourselves yet, but this
>> is not for lack of trying.”
>>                      — Douglas Adams, /Last Chance to See/
>>
>