Errata for hyperspec?

[Steve Haflich]

Just keep in mind that some of the items on the CLiki list propose changes
(divergences from) current normative ANSI CL requirements, and that others
are simply drafted sloppily.  These changes would not have automatically
passed review under the original X3J13 process, and no one should assume
their long life on the CLiki page means they would be uncontroversial.

On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 4:04 AM, Don Morrison <dfm2 at cmu.edu> wrote:

> When I reported an error I’d noticed in the HyperSpec to Lispworks three
> years ago their response pointed me at the CLiki page, so I suspect that is
> probably the best source of errata available. And, more importantly, that
> response seems to imply they have no interest in updating the HyperSpec.
> That said, I remain grateful to them that it is available, even in its
> ossified form.
>
>
> --
> Don Morrison <dfm2 at cmu.edu>
> “We are not an endangered species ourselves yet, but this
> is not for lack of trying.”
>                      — Douglas Adams, /Last Chance to See/
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/pro/attachments/20171214/beef1773/attachment.html>