[local-time-devel] proper way to "travel in time"(?)

Denys Rtveliashvili rtvd at mail.ru
Mon Oct 1 14:01:31 UTC 2007


Ops..

Indeed, I have forgotten to attach it. %(
Sending it with this email.

There was no particular reason for making the input local-time the last 
argument. And I like your idea on making it optional.

Regards,
Denys Rtveliashvili
> a _very_ preliminary comment: you fogot the attachment... ;)
>
> but other than that, is there any reason why the input local-time
> object in the arg list is not the first one? maybe due to &optional?
> would it be useful if the local-time arg were optional defaulting to
> (now)?
>
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: patch
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/local-time-devel/attachments/20071001/07a1d370/attachment.ksh>


More information about the local-time-devel mailing list