[local-time-devel] proper way to "travel in time"(?)

Attila Lendvai attila.lendvai at gmail.com
Mon Oct 1 12:55:11 UTC 2007


> (adjusted-local-time :day 15 (now))

a _very_ preliminary comment: you fogot the attachment... ;)

but other than that, is there any reason why the input local-time
object in the arg list is not the first one? maybe due to &optional?
would it be useful if the local-time arg were optional defaulting to
(now)?

-- 
 attila



More information about the local-time-devel mailing list