[Ecls-list] ? the proper arguments to load ASDF:MAKE-BUILD's .fasb output

Samium Gromoff _deepfire at feelingofgreen.ru
Wed Apr 7 13:52:33 UTC 2010

On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 15:10:00 +0200, james anderson <james.anderson at setf.de> wrote:
> good afternoon;
> i observe that, independent of the file name and type of the pathname  
> passed to make-build, the result file is typed "fasb" and the name is  
> that of the system. is it correct, that the "fasb" type is required  
> in order to load it? is there an alternative to the '-load' indicator  
> which works for files with other types?
> in order to start ecl with such a file, it appears also that, in  
> contrast to a simple '.fas', one must include some command-line  
> argument to load asdf prior to loading the .fasb. is this the  
> intended protocol?

I just rename it to .fas and LOAD that, instead.

  Samium Gromoff
"Actually I made up the term 'object-oriented', and I can tell you I
did not have C++ in mind." - Alan Kay (OOPSLA 1997 Keynote)

More information about the ecl-devel mailing list