[Ecls-list] ? the proper arguments to load ASDF:MAKE-BUILD's .fasb output

[james anderson]

good afternoon;

i observe that, independent of the file name and type of the pathname  
passed to make-build, the result file is typed "fasb" and the name is  
that of the system. is it correct, that the "fasb" type is required  
in order to load it? is there an alternative to the '-load' indicator  
which works for files with other types?

in order to start ecl with such a file, it appears also that, in  
contrast to a simple '.fas', one must include some command-line  
argument to load asdf prior to loading the .fasb. is this the  
intended protocol?




On 2010-04-05, at 21:29 , Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Samium Gromoff  
> <_deepfire at feelingofgreen.ru> wrote:
> The new ASDF has an unfortunate side-effect of placing the final
> product of ASDF:MAKE-BUILD in an unpredictable location --
> along with other binaries within the place deemed by ASDF as
> binary cache storage directory.
>
> This is why a new keyword argument :move-here was created. It gets  
> a pathname with the destination directory.
>
> Juanjo
>
> -- 
> Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC
> c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain)
> http://tream.dreamhosters.com
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> --------
> Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw- 
> dev_______________________________________________
> Ecls-list mailing list
> Ecls-list at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/ecl-devel/attachments/20100407/447a32b2/attachment.html>