[Ecls-list] Error on compiling type declarations without the type

Zach elzacho at gmail.com
Sat Jul 12 00:57:53 UTC 2008


Thanks for setting me straight.  Sure enough, clisp complains, it just
ignores the declaration rather than stopping the compile so I never noticed.


On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll <
juanjose.garciaripoll at googlemail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 10:04 PM, Zach <elzacho at gmail.com> wrote:
> > This is completely academic and a bit ludicrous to argue about, really.
> > Inserting a `type' everywhere I get these errors would fix things.  I was
> > just bringing up a seeming non-conformance.
> The thing is that SBCL implements the extension which is proposed in
> the comment to the specification. However, that is just a comment and
> for instance CLISP will complain about the same type declaration. It
> is not a big effort, probably, to look at ecl/src/cmp/cmpenv.lsp and
> add a couple of statements identifying type declarations for valid
> types, though.
> Juanjo
> --
> Facultad de Fisicas, Universidad Complutense,
> Ciudad Universitaria s/n Madrid 28040 (Spain)
> http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/ecl-devel/attachments/20080711/f4c7428b/attachment.html>

More information about the ecl-devel mailing list