[drakma-devel] Re: Portability of Drakma

[Erik Huelsmann]

On 4/6/07, Erik Huelsmann <ehuels at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3/9/07, Edi Weitz <edi at agharta.de> wrote:
> > On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 08:54:57 +0100, "Erik Huelsmann" <ehuels at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I created a patch (and a full archive) for drakma 0.6.0. I did
> > > initial testing with usocket 0.3.2 and sbcl on linux 2.6. I'll put
> > > up a text file at the same location to log the already-tested
> > > combinations. The archive is at http://hix.nu/drakma/ (which is
> > > behind my dsl line at 1Mbit).
> > >
> > > Version 0.3.2 for usocket is required: I added the
> > > close-the-stream-means-closing-the-socket API guarantee in that
> > > version.
> > >
> > > Any problems with usocket can be reported directly to me, here (for
> > > reference for other testers), or at usocket-devel at common-lisp.net.
> > >
> > > I'll be testing a number of other combinations too, but I was out of
> > > time this weekend.
> >
> > Did you get any more test results in the meantime?
>
> I did. I tested with LispWorks, Allegro 8, cmucl, ecl and clisp on Linux.
>
> My clisp was incompatible with cl+ssl, so I'll post more results
> later. ECL isn't compatible with trivial-gray-streams, it seems.
>
> The other 3 worked without problems.
>
> Leaves OpenMCL (which I can't test) and LispWorks and Allegro on
> Windows (which I'll post about later, since I'm in Linux now).

Ok. I tested on Windows too. I have LispWorks and ACL 6.2 on Windows.
The latter doesn't work with start.lisp from STARTER-PACK, so I wasn't
really able to tell. LispWorks works beautifully though.

That was all the testing I can do. BTW: the CL+SSL problems I
experienced were with the newest clisp (2.41), so it looks like Drakma
isn't able to run on clisp anymore (?).

If there are any more Windows/Linux implementations you want me to
test with, just say so!

bye,

Erik.