[cltl3-devel] RFC: CLtL3 Charter

[Gustavo]

2009/9/1 Drew Crampsie <drew.crampsie at gmail.com>

> 2009/9/1 Gustavo <gugamilare at gmail.com>:
> >
> >
> > 2009/9/1 <drew.crampsie at gmail.com>
> >>
> >> I'd personally much prefer a 'lispy' (read : verbose and understandable)
> >> implementation of regexps then the one from perl, and still wouldn't
> want it
> >> included as part of CLtL3..
> >
> > cl-ppcre allow the use of sexps as regexps. I think that they are
> "verbose"
> > and "understandable".
>
> So it might ... but as per section 4 "Preference will be given to
> topics that cannot be implemented portably and have multiple existing
> implementations.".
>

I'm not saying that cl-ppcre should be made part of cltl3, I actually agree
with you. That was just an off-topic comment (if someone doesn't know that
already).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cltl3-devel/attachments/20090901/9d10a2f3/attachment.html>