[clbuild-devel] restructuring code oranization, was: my-projects?
Albert Krewinkel
krewinkel at gmx.net
Mon Dec 15 09:39:03 UTC 2008
David Lichteblau <david at lichteblau.com> writes:
> If we do that, perhaps we would also want to set up
> wnpp-dependencies
> separately? Not sure.
>
> To reduce conflicts in dependencies, we might even abandon the
> single-file approach completely and save the dependencies of each
> $project into a file
> clbuild/dependencies/$project
> (However, it's easy to forget the "darcs add" for that file when adding
> new projects, so this could be more hassle than it's worth.)
>
> Opinions? Patches?
> d.
I like that idea and may give it a shot as soon as I find the time.
Which brings me to a different topic: Is there a specific reason, that
the clbuild-script is a single file, or did it just grow organicaly that
way? I ask, since I'd prefer having a `scripts' directory and a main
programm calling only the scripts which are needed. This could bring
the advantage of somewhat cleaner code at times (at least my
contributions are more of a mess than they have to be due to the current
one-file approach).
More information about the clbuild-devel
mailing list