read-depend branch is ready for another review...

[Robert Goldman]

On 7/14/17 Jul 14 -11:17 AM, Faré wrote:
> 1- At the end of find-system, the methods on additional-input-files
> should go now that you use the convenience methods, shouldn't they?
> 2- now that you invalidate the cache for input-files, shouldn't you
> put the append *inside* the with-asdf-cache? Or would that fail?

I'll get on those.

1. what's in FIND-SYSTEM is accessors to %ADDITIONAL-INPUT-FILES, not
ADDITIONAL-INPUT-FILES and the former has setters as well as getters, so
I wasn't sure I could use ADDITIONAL-INPUT-FILES.  I'll check.
2.  I'll fix this, thanks.

I'm going to push the first 2 commits into plan, since that's where they
belong, also.

More soon

R

> 
> —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
> If you wish to examine a granfalloon, just remove the skin of a toy
> balloon. — Bokonon
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Robert Goldman <rpgoldman at sift.net> wrote:
>> Tests now passing on all implementations, and there's been substantial
>> clean-up.
>>
>> Likely the first two commits on this branch should be merged with the
>> plan branch directly, since they don't have anything to do with read
>> dependencies per se.  Then we could move on to reviewing (and then
>> squash-merging) read-depends.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> r