New version of ASDF pushed

[Robert P. Goldman]

Faré wrote:
>> Should we push just asdf-3.2 or also uiop-3.2 (since the new XDG
>> functions are properly UIOP)?
>>
> (I assume you mean *features*)
> Actually, I don't think there's anything new asdf that warrants a feature,
> so I'd add a uiop feature only (and uiop has evolved enough since 2.27
> that a feature could help, especially considering that at least
> quicklisp distributes uiop without asdf). I believe uiop/driver.lisp
> is the correct place for the pushnew.

OK. Should we at some point define a stable UIOP feature set, and just
bump to 3.0 as a new stable point?

cheers,
r