[asdf-devel] Alternate default lisp system location
Robert P. Goldman
rpgoldman at sift.info
Wed Mar 12 13:00:45 UTC 2014
Pascal Costanza wrote:
> I'm expecting asdf to suddenly see asd files that it shouldn't. (In my configuration, only ~/lisp/develop/ contains "active" systems, the rest of ~/lisp may contain "inactive" ones - for example, alternate versions of the same systems.)
Can you clarify?
Do you tell ASDF to load from particular subdirectories of ~/lisp/, but
allow it to load from the default directory as well (instead of ignoring
the inherited directories)?
I do not use the DSL, being entrenched in use of
ASDF:*CENTRAL-REGISTRY*, so I am not familiar with many users' practice.
I suppose if one uses the DSL, one is likely to not use
This suggests, regrettably, that using obvious directory names, such as
~/common-lisp/ might not be a good idea.
So we are searching for a directory name to use that will:
a. Be visible to standard directory listers, both graphical and textual
b. Not introduce more confusion -- so no ~/quux/
c. Not already be in use by many, ideally any, users.
I suggest that this means we should use something that has "asdf" in its
name. Such as
I am open for suggestions.
I just stumbled on this when editing the manual (I will try to push my
edits today): I was sort of cringing at the idea of telling users they
should "just" put their systems in
which did not seem like something that anyone not wedded to XDG would
Suggestions welcome! Pascal, I appreciate your engaging in this
discussion: your participation will lead to better decision making.
More information about the asdf-devel