[asdf-devel] Alternate default lisp system location
dherring at tentpost.com
Thu Mar 13 02:54:58 UTC 2014
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014, Faré wrote:
> 1- I think we should proceed and add a default path anyway.
> ~/cl/ and/or ~/common-lisp/ sound fine to me, and I've seen no one
> complain about that.
> You could make it ~/local/common-lisp/ if you're into larger paths.
The computer I'm currently on uses ~/lisp for a lot of non-ASDF-related
systems, including numerous files that are not source code. On some other
systems, I use paths like ~/cl to distinguish from ~/racket and other
I agree with others who dislike this idea. ASDF will inflict significant
end-user pain for little benefit if it chooses to do a land grab on an
obvious directory name.
In my opinion, a lot of the complexity in ASDF, and a lot the motivation
for this proposal, stems from ASDF's conflation of the "loader" with the
"build system". That's the topic for another post...
More information about the asdf-devel