[Asdf-devel] package-system

[Faré]

fasciculus is nice (small package in latin)
But one-package-per-file is nicer. *If* there's going to be a
renaming, I'd vote for that, without a -system suffix:
asdf/one-package-per-file.lisp
(defsystem foo :class :one-package-per-file ...)

—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
What is mind? No matter! What is matter? Never mind!
        — Bertrand Russell's Grand Mother, In Karl Popper, The Unended Quest


On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Alastair Bridgewater
<alastair.bridgewater at gmail.com> wrote:
> For what it's worth, I always thought of the style as being
> one-package-per-file, but I called the build system that I developed around
> it "quick build" for a completely unrelated reason.
>
> I would suggest not calling it "quick-build", but other than that I'm not
> sure that I care.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Pascal J. Bourguignon
> <pjb at informatimago.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 16 Apr 2014, at 00:00, Faré <fahree at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Before the release is the best time for renaming things. If you have a
>> suggestion for a better name, now is the time to speak, not later.
>>
>>
>> fasciculus
>>
>> (Since we have alexandria and cesarum, we could go on…)
>>
>> —
>> __Pascal Bourguignon__
>>
>