[Asdf-devel] package-system

[Drew Crampsie]

FWIW, I also think that one-package-per-file is nicer, and better than
anything else I have heard. So if my vote counts and we are voting
shortly, that is likely what I would go with.


On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Faré <fahree at gmail.com> wrote:
> fasciculus is nice (small package in latin)
> But one-package-per-file is nicer. *If* there's going to be a
> renaming, I'd vote for that, without a -system suffix:
> asdf/one-package-per-file.lisp
> (defsystem foo :class :one-package-per-file ...)
>
> —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
> What is mind? No matter! What is matter? Never mind!
>         — Bertrand Russell's Grand Mother, In Karl Popper, The Unended Quest
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Alastair Bridgewater
> <alastair.bridgewater at gmail.com> wrote:
>> For what it's worth, I always thought of the style as being
>> one-package-per-file, but I called the build system that I developed around
>> it "quick build" for a completely unrelated reason.
>>
>> I would suggest not calling it "quick-build", but other than that I'm not
>> sure that I care.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Pascal J. Bourguignon
>> <pjb at informatimago.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 16 Apr 2014, at 00:00, Faré <fahree at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Before the release is the best time for renaming things. If you have a
>>> suggestion for a better name, now is the time to speak, not later.
>>>
>>>
>>> fasciculus
>>>
>>> (Since we have alexandria and cesarum, we could go on…)
>>>
>>> —
>>> __Pascal Bourguignon__
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asdf-devel mailing list
> Asdf-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel