[asdf-devel] Enforcing pure *.asd files
Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
juanjose.garciaripoll at googlemail.com
Thu Mar 18 22:37:54 UTC 2010
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Faré <fahree at gmail.com> wrote:
> In other words, I think that supporting ASDF is important, but
> ultimately an evolutionary dead-end.
>
That is hard to read from the project leaders. I feel rather neutral about
this and please do not feel offended by the following sentence, but if this
is going to be the official position of the project then it should be better
advertised, including perhaps the manual, usual c.l.l forums and maybe the
ASDF prompt itself.
Juanjo
--
Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC
c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain)
http://tream.dreamhosters.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/asdf-devel/attachments/20100318/67eb6536/attachment.html>
More information about the asdf-devel
mailing list