[asdf-devel] Q about ASDF on LW
Nick Levine
ndl at ravenbrook.com
Wed Jan 20 23:29:48 UTC 2010
Your backtrace shows nothing obviously wrong, and if extending the
stack does the trick, the problem is possibly that LW starts with
an extremely small stack and/or does some stack-allocation
optimizations that blow the little stack it has. I blame LW
settings (did you override the defaults?)
I haven't overridden anything. For some reason I've never understood
LW has a small default stack size.
By the way, this is ASDF revision 1.375. LW 5.1 has been fine
interpreted with other (earlier) revisions.
- n
More information about the asdf-devel
mailing list