[asdf-devel] Q about ASDF on LW

Nick Levine ndl at ravenbrook.com
Wed Jan 20 23:29:48 UTC 2010


   Your backtrace shows nothing obviously wrong, and if extending the
   stack does the trick, the problem is possibly that LW starts with
   an extremely small stack and/or does some stack-allocation
   optimizations that blow the little stack it has. I blame LW
   settings (did you override the defaults?)

I haven't overridden anything. For some reason I've never understood
LW has a small default stack size.

By the way, this is ASDF revision 1.375. LW 5.1 has been fine
interpreted with other (earlier) revisions.

- n




More information about the asdf-devel mailing list