[asdf-devel] Q about ASDF on LW
Faré
fahree at gmail.com
Wed Jan 20 19:30:48 UTC 2010
If you actually send the backtrace on the list, or attach it to an
ASDF bug on launchpad.net, that would help a lot figure out what's
wrong and how to fix it.
[ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ]
A computer is like an Old Testament god, with a lot of rules and no mercy.
— Joseph Campbell
2010/1/20 Daniel Herring <dherring at tentpost.com>:
> Hi all,
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 10:09:39 GMT
> From: Nick Levine <ndl at ravenbrook.com>
> Reply-To: Discuss changes to LibCL <libcl-devel at lists.libcl.com>
> Subject: Re: [LibCL-devel] [ann] libcl-2010-01-18-snapshot
>
> > All the above was with LW 6.0. I also tried LW 5.1.2 and got a
> > stack overflow loading alexandria\alexandria.asd
>
> Odd; this snapshot contains the same alexandria as the last
> beta...
>
> I suspect it's an ASDF thing rather than anything to do with
> Alexandria. Where shall I send the backtrace?
>
> Btw this is fixed by compiling asdf rather than loading it into LW as
> interpretted source.
> ---------------------------------------
>
>
> Can an ASDF developer reproduce this on LW5? Is there a good reason to
> need a compiled ASDF, or would LW benefit from an extra eval-when or
> finalize-instance somewhere? If we should always compile, is there a way
> to use asdf-binary-locations to control the dump of the ASDF fasl?
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel
>
> P.S. alexandria.asd last changed on 2008-11-23.
More information about the asdf-devel
mailing list