[asdf-devel] pathname translations does not like my f2cl asd

[Faré]

The previous .asd had it right in not using make-pathname in the perform,
but instead calling (first (output-files op f)). This one should do
the same, too.
And if it wants to translation for this file, it should also have
output-files return
(values (list ...) t).

[ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ]
Let's take compulsion out of compassion.




On 9 April 2010 20:12, Mario S. Mommer <m_mommer at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> so here is another one. I can send the .asd file if you are interested,
> but for now I guess this snippet is enough:
>
> (defmethod perform ((o compile-op) (f f77-file))
>  (apply #'f2cl:f2cl-compile
>         (cons (make-pathname :name (component-name f)
>                              :type "f"
>                              :defaults (component-pathname f))
>               (compiler-options f))))
>
> the error is
>
> Couldn't load
> #P"/home/mommer/.cache/common-lisp/sbcl-1.0.37-linux-...": file
> does not exist.
>   [Condition of type SB-INT:SIMPLE-FILE-ERROR]
>
> which is caused by the fact that I give the f2cl compiler a different
> output path than that expected by the loader.
>
> I do not know how to fix this yet, except for issuing
> (asdf:disable-output-translation). It is probably a matter of RTFM. But
> I guess that proves the more general point that enabling the output
> translation by default will break existing setups when upgrading.
>
> Regards,
>        Mario
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> asdf-devel mailing list
> asdf-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
>