[hunchentoot-devel] Problem with late calls to POST-PARAMETERS

Peter Seibel peter at gigamonkeys.com
Fri Jun 12 13:31:51 UTC 2009


On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Jeff
Cunningham<j.k.cunningham at comcast.net> wrote:
> Peter Seibel wrote:
>> I ran into a problem converting some of my code to run with
>> Hunchentoot 1.0. This patch fixes it and -- as far as I can tell after
>> a bit of poking around -- is possibly righteous. What do you think?
>> The basic problem that I ran into is explained in the comment in the
>> patch.
>>
>> -Peter
>>
>> diff -r 635083ac9419 hunchentoot/request.lisp
>> --- a/hunchentoot/request.lisp        Sun May 31 11:31:25 2009 -0700
>> +++ b/hunchentoot/request.lisp        Mon Jun 01 14:19:19 2009 -0700
>> @@ -346,7 +346,12 @@
>>    (get-parameters request))
>>
>>  (defmethod post-parameters :before ((request request))
>> -  (maybe-read-post-parameters :request request))
>> +  ;; Force here because if someone calls POST-PARAMETERS they actually
>> +  ;; want them, regardless of why the RAW-POST-DATA has been filled
>> +  ;; in. (For instance, if SEND-HEADERS has been called, filling in
>> +  ;; RAW-POST-DATA, and then subsequent code calls POST-PARAMETERS,
>> +  ;; without the :FORCE flag POST-PARAMETERS would return NIL.)
>> +  (maybe-read-post-parameters :request request :force t))
>>
>>  (defun post-parameters* (&optional (request *request*))
>>    "Returns an alist of the POST parameters associated with the REQUEST
>>
>>
>>
> Peter, did you ever get any response to this?

Nope.

-Peter


-- 
Peter Seibel
http://www.codersatwork.com/
http://www.gigamonkeys.com/blog/




More information about the Tbnl-devel mailing list