[hunchentoot-devel] Problem with late calls to POST-PARAMETERS

Jeff Cunningham j.k.cunningham at comcast.net
Fri Jun 12 13:05:29 UTC 2009


Peter Seibel wrote:
> I ran into a problem converting some of my code to run with
> Hunchentoot 1.0. This patch fixes it and -- as far as I can tell after
> a bit of poking around -- is possibly righteous. What do you think?
> The basic problem that I ran into is explained in the comment in the
> patch.
>
> -Peter
>
> diff -r 635083ac9419 hunchentoot/request.lisp
> --- a/hunchentoot/request.lisp	Sun May 31 11:31:25 2009 -0700
> +++ b/hunchentoot/request.lisp	Mon Jun 01 14:19:19 2009 -0700
> @@ -346,7 +346,12 @@
>    (get-parameters request))
>
>  (defmethod post-parameters :before ((request request))
> -  (maybe-read-post-parameters :request request))
> +  ;; Force here because if someone calls POST-PARAMETERS they actually
> +  ;; want them, regardless of why the RAW-POST-DATA has been filled
> +  ;; in. (For instance, if SEND-HEADERS has been called, filling in
> +  ;; RAW-POST-DATA, and then subsequent code calls POST-PARAMETERS,
> +  ;; without the :FORCE flag POST-PARAMETERS would return NIL.)
> +  (maybe-read-post-parameters :request request :force t))
>
>  (defun post-parameters* (&optional (request *request*))
>    "Returns an alist of the POST parameters associated with the REQUEST
>
>
>   
Peter, did you ever get any response to this?

Jeff





More information about the Tbnl-devel mailing list