[hunchentoot-devel] script-name*

[Hans Hübner]

Fixed, thanks.

Hans

On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Cyrus Harmon <ch-tbnl at bobobeach.com> wrote:
> Well, it looks like Hans found the same problem I found with script-name,
> but, and this is a very minor stylistic point, since we already have the
> request here, why don't we just call (script-name request) instead of
> (script-name*)?
>
> thanks,
>
> Cyrus
>
>
> Index: headers.lisp
> ===================================================================
> --- headers.lisp        (revision 3320)
> +++ headers.lisp        (working copy)
> @@ -162,10 +162,10 @@
>                            "The server could not verify that you are
> authorized to access the document requested.  Either you supplied the wrong
> credentials \(e.g., bad password), or your browser doesn't understand how to
> supply the credentials required.")
>                           ((#.+http-forbidden+)
>                            (format nil "You don't have permission to access
> ~A on this server."
> -                                   (script-name*)))
> +                                   (script-name request)))
>                           ((#.+http-not-found+)
>                            (format nil "The requested URL ~A was not found
> on this server."
> -                                   (script-name*)))
> +                                   (script-name request)))
>                           ((#.+http-bad-request+)
>                            "Your browser sent a request that this server
> could not understand.")
>                           (otherwise ""))
>
>
> instead of_______________________________________________
> tbnl-devel site list
> tbnl-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/tbnl-devel
>