[hunchentoot-devel] Hunchentoot behind apache http proxy (performance)

[Andrei Stebakov]

The moment came when I had to move all of my site from being partially
static http web pages to pages generated (or served from cached files) by
Hunchentoot.
The overall performance noticeably degraded in terms of response time. Even
in cases when HT does nothing but serves a static file from its cache the
response time increased from 0.3 sec to 1.5 sec (tested with httperf).
I am running Apache 2 on Ubuntu (everything latest) with sbcl 1.0.18.
I understand that when ht running behind the proxy the response time should
increase. I wonder what can I do to optimize.
Is it time to run HT as a standalone server? I still have a bunch of pages
that I need to serve statically and lately my sbcl had problems with GC so
it crashes time after time from heap exhaustion,  so I am a bit
uncomfortable to switch completely to Hunchentoot.
I wonder how do you guys solve those problems?

Thank you,
Andrew
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/tbnl-devel/attachments/20080725/8f58bd50/attachment.html>