[hunchentoot-devel] CCL/OpenMCL and WITH-TIMEOUT
Edi Weitz
edi at agharta.de
Mon Feb 18 16:15:39 UTC 2008
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:39:40 +0100, "Hans Hübner" <hans at huebner.org> wrote:
> Does anyone here have sentiments regarding WITH-TIMEOUT? If not,
> I'd propose that WITH-TIMEOUT be totally removed from Hunchentoot.
Not that I'm totally against it, but what's the reason? Right now,
I'm seeing it as a kind of stopgap solution for Lisps without stream
timeouts. If you don't have /any/ timeouts, you're pretty prone to
DoS attacks, aren't you?
Can't WITH-TIMEOUT be implemented in OpenMCL 1.2?
More information about the Tbnl-devel
mailing list