[hunchentoot-devel] CMUCL vs SBCL: server speed

[Edi Weitz]

[Please use the mailing list.}

On Sun, 3 Dec 2006 14:24:52 -0800, Jeffrey Cunningham <jeffrey at cunningham.net> wrote:

> Hmmm. That's interesting. I just tried both at once and it killed
> CMUCL (running under slime). I guess my unstable collection of CMUCL
> + Slime + various CL packages don't all like each other yet.

I think one of the links I sent talks about issues with SLIME.  I'm
sure Google will find something for you, but ISTR that the general
wisdom is that these two don't mix well - the guys on the SLIME or
CMUCL mailing list will probably know more about it.

Cheers,
Edi.