[hunchentoot-devel] CMUCL vs SBCL: server speed

[Edi Weitz]

On Sun, 3 Dec 2006 13:53:58 -0800, Jeffrey Cunningham <jeffrey at cunningham.net> wrote:

> I thought I'd share some observations concerning a big difference in
> server speed I've observered between CMUCL (19d) and SBCL (0.9.18).
>
> I've been working on a small website consisting of six or eight
> pages, each with mixed text and graphics (images from a few k up to
> 80k) using Hunchentoot as the server. Running it with CMUCL I
> noticed that the page load times were rather slow (2-5 seconds to
> all the images)

  http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/tbnl-devel/2005-August/000367.html
  http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/tbnl-devel/2005-October/000466.html

Cheers,
Edi.