License for Slime

[Luís Oliveira]

On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 3:23 PM Stelian Ionescu <sionescu at cddr.org> wrote:
> Maybe you don't necessarily need to change the licence of existing code.
> Just like with the legacy code from Spice Lisp and CMUCL which was public
> domain, it should be enough to state that the licence for new code is MIT
and
> over time the code base would become a mixture, just like SBCL. I guess
this
> should be ok to appease lawyers.

I wouldn't have a problem with that. Would it help, Red?

-- 
Luís Oliveira
http://kerno.org/~luis/