2nd repl for same inferior lisp

[Nick Levine]

Finally got around to trying your suggestion. It killed my original repl
(along with the background task that this was performing) and so gained me
nothing.

- n

On 27 March 2017 at 16:41, Mark Evenson <evenson.not.org at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 3/17/17 11:14, Jim Newton wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Can someone tell me how to (or if it is possible to) create a second repl
> > buffer for the same inferior lisp process.  Maybe this is not supported,
> > because when I look in the slime manual, it seems to always refer to "THE
> > REPL buffer for the current SLIME connection”
>
> If you want to start an additional inferior lisp process for the same
> implementation (not strictly "the same inferior lisp process" but maybe
> what you mean?):
>
> 1) visiting the REPL issue a M-x rename-uniquely
>
> 2) You may now start an additional REPL for the associated inferior lisp
> via the usual M-x slime invocation.
>
> --
> "No, this is not a disentanglement, but a progressive /knotting-into/."
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/slime-devel/attachments/20170525/1c87626c/attachment.html>