finding an implementation of SWANK interface
dougk at google.com
Tue Dec 19 14:53:40 UTC 2017
Not in connection with any one issue in particular, I'm trying to make the
That ought to be a sufficient remedy to this, right?
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:36 AM, Luís Oliveira <luismbo at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 1:29 PM, 73budden . <budden73 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> ... Sadly, it had to be reverted because ran into SBCL's compiler lock.
> >> Perhaps you can come up with a solution?
> > No. I'm trying to do some SBCL hacking, but I'm (yet) not experienced
> > enough to fix such things.
> I wonder if we can play with compute-applicable-method to force
> compilation of the interfaces/implementations ahead of time?
> <https://github.com/guicho271828/inlined-generic-function> might hold
> some tips on how to do that. This might a fun project if you'd like to
> explore the MOP.
> Martin's idea is promising too.
> Regarding your patch, I really dislike defining special variables
> without the earmuffs. I've been bitten by such variables in the past
> and it's quite annoying and confusing. (defconstant would be slightly
> better, but still I'd rather pursue the other two ideas first. :-(
> Luís Oliveira
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the slime-devel