SLIME + Named readtables
luismbo at gmail.com
Fri Aug 18 19:02:43 UTC 2017
Tracking in-readtable forms and passing the readtable designator along in
evaluation/compilation requests sounds consensual. Let's start with that,
what do you think?
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017, 17:15 73budden . <budden73 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Good idea, but this PR does not implement my current suggestion. I
> have to work on code for a while. Before I start, I'd like to know do
> you (or does anyone) see any more issues with the solution described?
> 2017-08-18 16:39 GMT+03:00, Luís Oliveira <luismbo at gmail.com>:
> > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 1:03 PM, 73budden . <budden73 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Sorry, I didn't get what you meant :) Anyway, the quesion is still
> >> open if the change suggested would break someone's things, so I hope
> >> it is not a big harm to give more details.
> > I suggest we move on to pull request #278 then. Maybe you can start by
> > rebasing/merging against latest master?
> > Cheers,
> > --
> > Luís Oliveira
> > http://kerno.org/~luis/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the slime-devel