Playing nice with custom repls?

[Zach Beane]

This code has been working nicely so far. I'll keep using it to see if it
has any unexpected side effects.

Zach

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Luís Oliveira <luismbo at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Zach Beane <xach at xach.com> wrote:
> > I don't understand this part "REPL equests are serialized and processed
> > by the same thread" - does that mean the REPL thread is also responsible
> > for M-. action and arglist display in file buffers?
>
> No, this only affects things going on in the slime-repl buffer.
>
> On second thought, it might not be too hard to change that behavior.
> (Might need to think the implications through though.) Can you try
> this? <https://gist.github.com/luismbo/b8be134c3b2095a641aa176a957e652f>.
> (No need to restart SLIME or anything, just M-x eval-region that.)
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Luís Oliveira
> http://kerno.org/~luis/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/slime-devel/attachments/20160615/8ae14595/attachment.html>