Controlling fasl location

[Paul Bowyer]

Hello Max,

I tried the code than Ben Hyde published and that worked. It took some 
testing before I discovered that was working though.

As I played around with Ben's code, I came to the realization that your 
code was working also. I just didn't give it enough testing to see.

I have this one lisp file that I use to build the project that I was 
working on, and the fasl always showed up in my source directory, but 
that file is the one that calls asdf and it's not in the asdf system 
file so it never shows up in the asdf fasl location. So I thought your 
code wasn't working, but when I did compile/load with other code, your 
code worked fine.

I've commented out Ben's code in ~/.emacs and I have your code in 
~/.slime.lisp and it appears to be working fine.

My apologies Max, for thinking your code wasn't working.

I put much of the above in a message to Ben Hyde, which I CCd you on, so 
You'll see this again when that mail gets to you.

Sincerely,

Paul Bowyer
//

On 06/17/2013 03:57 PM, Max Mikhanosha wrote:
> At Mon, 17 Jun 2013 10:52:36 -0700,
> Paul Bowyer wrote:
>> Hello Max,
>>
>> I tried the code in *inferior-lisp* and it produced this function
>> #<FUNCTION (LAMBDA (PATH OPTIONS)) {100657C57B}>
>>
>> I then tried compiling/loading a file, but the fasl still goes in my
>> source directory.
> Well, I have no idea how its possible, how old is your Slime? I suggest
> trying slime from CVS first.. It seems symbol is there, but its not being
> called.
>
> If that fails to work, then I'm all out of ideas. It seems to work fine for
> Ben Hyde.
>
>> I tried placing the code in ~/.swank.lisp, started emacs/slime,
>> compiled/loaded a file, and still the fasl ends up in my source directory.
>>
>> Is there some glue code that connect this function to compile-file in
>> slime that might be missing?
>>
>> By the way, when you email me, I get two messages per mailing.
> My email program automatically does To <person> and Cc: Slime-devel, the usual
> scenario is that mailing list software is smart enough not to duplicate such emails
> to the person mentioned in tho To: field, but new common-lisp.net does not seem
> to do it.
>
> I removed you from To: and this email simply goes to Cc: slime-devel
>
>
> Regards,
>   Max
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/slime-devel/attachments/20130617/93318d24/attachment.html>