[slime-devel] Some xemacs issues/fixes
toy.raymond at gmail.com
Tue Aug 18 01:59:25 UTC 2009
Helmut Eller wrote:
> * Raymond Toy [2009-08-15 21:16+0200] writes:
>> Helmut Eller wrote:
>>> I there an easy way to build XEmacs from source? I mean a way that
>>> doesn't require me to mess around with the f'ing package system and that
>>> makes the .el files accessible?
>> I grab the source tarball, then grab the xemacs-sumo packages tarball
>> and the xemacs-mule-sumo packages tarball (if you enable mule/unicode).
>> Pick a directory where you want to install the xemacs binary, and
>> extract the sumo tarballs in lib/xemacs. I never play around with the
>> package system.
> The sumo tarballs don't contain the source, AFAICT.
That's odd. My xemacs-sumo-2007-04-27.tar.bz2 contains source. I
didn't check everything, but for every elc I checked, I have an el file.
>>> I'll disable slime-autodoc for XEmacs as it is based and eldoc and the
>>> eldoc in XEmacs is from 2003 which doesn't have the hooks needed for
>> Ok, but I hope that doesn't disable the display to slime-typeout. If it
>> does, I'll sorely miss that feature.
> No that doesn't disable slime-typeout. But yes, slime-autodoc would be
> one of the better uses for the typeout frame.
Oh, that's cool then.
I did try the latest eldoc from emacs 22.3. With a few tweaks, it seems
to work with xemacs. But I haven't really tried it with slime yet.
More information about the slime-devel