[slime-devel] Re: slime feature proposal: message-of-the-day

Marco Baringer mb at bese.it
Sat Nov 4 14:49:33 UTC 2006

Jeffrey Cunningham <jeffrey at cunningham.net> writes:

> Okay. 
> The current manual looks like it was generated with makeinfo. Where
> can I find the source for that?


> Is it necessarily desirable to continue using that documentation
> model? I just put togther documentation for a large set of codes at
> work using doxygen which, of course, has no Lisp support, but did open
> my eyes to the possibilities. 

personally i believe the things like doxygen, while usefull, should
only complement a hand written user manual. using something like
sbcl's docstrings.lisp would be cool for the swank configuration
variables, but i'd strongly suggest keeping the current model.

Ring the bells that still can ring.
Forget your perfect offering.
There is a crack in everything.
That's how the light gets in.
	-Leonard Cohen

More information about the slime-devel mailing list