[slime-devel] Re: Slime 1.2.1

[GP lisper]

On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 10:26:44 +0300, <nikodemus at random-state.net> wrote:
> GP lisper <spambait at CloudDancer.com> writes:
>
>>> The only thing that tends to break predictably is slime-1.2.1!
>>
>> You have it backwards.
>
> Get real.

Heh, nice trick, invent a problem, propose a fix, and insist that it
be done, while telling anyone pointing at the man behind the curtain
that they are wrong, and failing to answer their questions.

Nowhere do you demonstrate a real problem, the only real problem lies
with the usual startup problems of new users, made worse by putting
them on the SBCL fast track.  Slime has been released via CVS for a
long time now, rather successfully.  Other than SBCL, what else
doesn't work on a regular basis with slime?

I like SBCL as software, what I don't like is the attitude of most of
the SBCL developers that only they know what is best for all of us.


-- 
If you use SLIME, it will categorize compiler noise for you into
Errors, Warnings, and Notes.  Lets see VI match that!