[slime-devel] Re: Slime 1.2.1
GP lisper
spambait at CloudDancer.com
Mon Apr 10 10:08:43 UTC 2006
On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 22:57:43 +0200, <m_mommer at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> During the last few weeks, I have seen lots of people stumble over the
> slime-1.2.1 tarball, and having it not work. I think this is a pitty.
Who? Brand new users? Old-timers?? With the lack of posts here, I'd
guess it's beginners, and you only hear about failures from them.
Once I got slime working, I've never had a problem from CVS that
wasn't immediately cleared up - i.e., no loss of opportunity to code
Lisp.
> If nobody wants to engineer regular releases, it would be already a
> *lot* better to just substitute the slime-1.2.1 with weekly snapshots.
Getting it from CVS is simple, is easily automated, and is the most
'up-to-date'. I'm strongly in favor of minimizing the workload on
devs.
--
If you use SLIME, it will categorize compiler noise for you into
Errors, Warnings, and Notes. Lets see VI match that!
More information about the slime-devel
mailing list