[slime-devel] Jump to source code
hww
hww at inbox.ru
Fri Mar 18 07:56:22 UTC 2005
Edi Weitz wrote:
>On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 04:27:00 +0200, hww <hww at inbox.ru> wrote:
>
>
>
>>This is bad.
>>What is the problem with file without definition?
>>
>>
>
>A file without function definitions is not a program, that's very
>simple.
>
>
Why? The specification of Lisp does not describe about.
(defun ()
(+1 2)
)
(foo)
In finish there was (foo) it was not defined as another function.
What is the problem about to have
(foo)
(bar)
And what is the problem if both of them implemented in different file?
In result the file without definitions.
More information about the slime-devel
mailing list