[slime-devel] Re: CLISP users - stick with FAIRLY-STABLE (Was: Re: inspector for clisp)

[Luke Gorrie]

marco <mb at bese.it> writes:

> it wasn't too hard after all. i put in some dark and evil read time
> conditionals which pick between the "real" inspector and a dummy
> implementation which tells the user to upgrade. it's not great, and
> i'd delete the code as soon as clisp 2.34 comes out, but at least
> slime compiles, loads and the rest of the inspector works.

Great!